IfadIoeAssetBanner

Mozambique: interim evaluation of Nampula artisanal fisheries project

25 May 2000

Community organisations and empowerment

The below picture shows Marisa at a well built by the project in Moma equipped with a water pump. The surroundings of the well are very clean and tidy and the buckets properly lined. A five-member committee that has been elected at a community meeting where all families sharing the well were present, looks after the well and takes care of its operation and maintenance on a daily basis. Each family contributes Mt 1,000 per month to the well maintenance fund. The committee was elected before the well was constructed and the committee in collaboration with the Project decided siting of the well. This was based on their intimate experience and knowledge of the local conditions and water availability of the terrain. Marisa told the completion evaluation mission that the well and water pump has had an important impact on her and her family's overall livelihood.

A total of 122 such water committees have been formed in 42 fishing communities, who manage and maintain the 122 wells that have been constructed or rehabilitated by the Project. Beneficiaries actively participate in the management committee deliberations and contribute to the pump maintenance expenses readily and willingly. Four other community committees, Micro-project committees elected in a similar fashion as the water committees have been active in contributing to the construction of health centers and schools. These committees not only were involved in the planning of each micro-project and work closely with the Project and the contractor in the implementation but also contribute 25% of the total project costs in the form of labour and local materials. In addition, the Project promoted the formation of 14 local Fisheries Resource Management and Co-management Committees of boat and fishing-net owners, which in close collaboration with the Fisheries Administration are fighting to impose discipline in the fishing effort by and within the fishing communities aiming at a sustainable exploitation of the country's valuable marine resources.

The Nampula project facilitated the formation of community committees and organisations through: (i) focusing on the creation of enabling conditions, such as access to credit and savings facilities, linking fishing and other economic activities with markets through private traders and micro-enterprises, etc. that enhanced the capacity of beneficiaries to improve their household income, and (ii) creating conditions for the satisfaction of the communities basic needs: water supply, primary health and sanitary care and education, in compliance with the ideals of sustainable human development.

The experience shows that community development is a slow and complex process and emphasis need to be given to understanding the complex socio-political fabric of the communities in the project area. In the initial stages of group formation, there is an important stage of learning and adaptation that may be negatively affected by over ambitious targets, lack of transparency or establishment of unrealistic expectations. The members of all committees have received training by the project extension staff, who continues to act on an advisory capacity to the committees. The early involvement of the project beneficiaries, from planning to implementation of each micro-project catalysed a sense of belonging and ownership and provided a firm basis for sustainable participatory development. NAFP has progressively empowered the communities by promoting their awareness of development prospects and by building capacities and skills that are necessary to ensure their effective participation, at present and future, in decision-making processes that affect their well being. The established institutional dialogue and linkages between committees and fishermen associations and formal management bodies, including the Fisheries Administration has been an important part of the empowerment of stakeholders and may provide a model to be replicated in other communities and geographical areas of the country.

Recommendations:

  • New associations and organisations require a significant amount of assistance with the bureaucratic process of formalisation and registration. Institutional support and training to such bodies is perceived important to not only the development of capacity but also the establishment of realistic aims and objectives.
  • No implementation of any participatory activity is commenced prior to ensuring that all and every step of each phase from planning to implementation has been understood and endorsed by the community.
  • Enhancement of participation and ownership of project activities by beneficiaries requires training, strong communication links and dialogue amongst extension staff, credit agency, the target communities and other institutions in the sector. The necessity of training the extensionists in effective communication skills and in improving the competence and overall capacity of the extension service becomes more than apparent.

 

  • The empowerment process still requires formalisation, legal status and recognition by the authorities. There is need to improve the institutional and legal framework for the establishment of co-management organisations, including definition of competence and authority.

Participatory adaptive research, extension and marketing

‘Before project start, we did not know about trammel nets for fishing shrimps. Through the project, experienced fishermen came all the way from India to Mozambique, who in co-operation with IDPPE extensionists introduced to us this new technology. Using trammel nets we have improved our shrimp catches'. Saide is from Moma village, Northeastern Mozambique and has been fisherman for all his life. Using the traditional nets he could hardly catch any shrimp. Now, Saide catches between 20-30 kg of good quality shrimp per day, which adds materially to his daily income. The below picture shows Indian fisherman Anthony to demonstrate to Saide the use of trammel nets.

The Project in partnership with fishermen has tested at various fishing centers different types of fishing gear with the main purpose to find efficient and low cost fishing technologies appropriate for the various commercial species found in the project area. The Project tested also various approaches to fish processing and preservation in order to solve physical problems in fish handling, collection and delivery system, all to encourage fishermen to adopt sustainable fishing practices and promote efficiency in fish production.

The participatory adaptive trials benefited from fishermen's knowledge and needs, and contributed to increased awareness of artisanal fishery development potential and constraints. It provided vital feedback in technology design in response to their suggestions. Before the end of the participatory trial, participating fishermen knew the results/benefits and spread the word amongst their community fellow men several of whom absorbed positive experience. Several examples from the project's evaluation may appropriately illustrate the above. The use of trammel nets for shrimp harvesting in the experimentation exercises was successful and many fishermen adopted the technology. Likewise, a number of fishermen took up gill nets, long-lines and trammel nets as appropriate to best suit their fishing effort. These nets do not catch the same type of fish nor the same size and amount of pelagic as the beach seines. Demersals are an additional catch type with the new fishing methods, which in most cases fetch higher prices and target the 5-10% high income class of urban markets in Nampula. Furthermore, a number of fish processors in Moma and Angoche have shown a positive appreciation of the upgraded smoking kiln, as modified by the project based on the ‘chorkor' method, which is a low cost smoker, with higher production capacity, better efficiency in wood consumption and easier working conditions.

With the integration of local fishing communities into research and technology development, the NAFP has validated both the relevance of adaptive experimentation approach and the fast dissemination and adoption of generated technological innovation. Participating fishermen have contributed not only to a more efficient and cost effective research but relieved strain from the extension workers and contributed, also, to the dissemination of research results. However, the process of dissemination and the adoption rates of research results by beneficiaries could be improved, and the strengthening of the extension service as a whole including the development of technical extension messages in the project area requires more attention.

Experience shows that the development and successful introduction of fisheries technologies and fishing practices is dependent on many factors beyond the technology itself, including access to inputs and financial services, the market opportunities for new products, processing and storage techniques.

With regard to market development, the Project has been successful in facilitating and influencing positively the availability of fishing gear in the project area not through its direct importation but through influencing the duties and tariff levels and through linking the private sector marketing networks with the fishing communities. Experience shows also that the establishment and maintenance of a market information system to support associated project activities (especially fisheries technology and processing) is relevant and useful, but its sustainable development needs still to be perfected. The encouragement of the Fishermen Associations to get involved in marketing activities including the supply of fishing gear and other inputs as well as the marketing of fish and fish products and gradually the development of shore marketing infrastructure will be an appropriate step towards enhancing sustainability of fishing operations.

Recommendations:

 

  • The process of the dissemination of research results in the project area and the strengthening of the extension service as a whole including the development of technical extension messages should be given further attention and support.
  • Future project designs incorporate more active policy and planning roles for articulation with the Government including support for further improvement of the macro-economic framework for the trading of fishery outputs and inputs (taxes, tariffs protection levels and imports) and the building of effective linkages between fishermen and the private sector either directly through project initiatives or/and indirectly through NGOs.
  • The Project promotes market development initiatives including, for instance, the establishment of shore infrastructure, landing facilities, auction halls, market information and provision of credit for the development of ice making and cold storage facilities by the private sector.
  • The Project provides institutional support to build capacity of Fishermen Associations to get involved in trade and marketing activities.

Co-management of marine resources and sustainability

‘We were using mosquito nets for years. We thought we had good catches although they contained many low value juveniles and very small fish. We did not know that by catching the juveniles and the very small fish we were in reality damaging our future fish harvests and incomes'. ‘Trawlers was another of our big problems. They came and destroyed our nets and we got nothing. We could not get any compensation'. Fishermen Abaca and Abdalla from the coastal village of Larde started understanding the dangers from the use of mosquito nets when they joined the co-management committees of fisheries resources. Now they use 12-mm mesh size in their beach seine nets and catch mostly marketable fish with out harming marine resource sustainability. With the legal dispensation to extend the trawler exclusion zone from 1-3 nautical miles from the shore, achieved by the Project, Abaca and Abdalla are helping the Fisheries Administration to reduce encroachment.

The Project has made inroads into the marine resource management issue and has demonstrated that by working together in a co-management partnership with the fishing communities, the fisheries institutions and the Fisheries Administration it is possible to lay the foundation for a long-term sustainable exploitation of the valuable natural marine resource to the benefit of the artisanal, semi-industrial and industrial fisheries. The resource management issue involves development of strategies for fisheries resources research, improvement of fisheries statistics, monitoring and surveillance activities and the development of institutional arrangements to translate the resource management information into operational management action. By creating awareness of fisheries management issues and acceptance of the need for the imposition of discipline in the fishing effort by and within the communities, the Project has shown how to develop fisheries management mechanisms and implement them in close collaboration with the fishermen, the Fisheries Institutions and the Maritime Administration.

Surveillance and policing by the Ministry of Fisheries alone could not be sufficient to impose regulation of management of the fish resources and achieve discipline of fishermen. It requires the active participation of the fishermen themselves and their organisations. The Fisheries Administration acknowledged the importance of this and made good use of the Resource Management/Co-management Committees to create awareness in fisheries management issues and develop a Co-management framework for a judicious and sustainable use of the local marine resources. The fishermen and their committees/associations agreed to co-operate and undertake a role in the management of the marine resource when they realised that such actions were serving directly their own interests. They would not undertake them for the interest of the state or because the law required so.

The participatory research trials on different types of fishing gear and practices that IDPPE conducted in partnership with the fishermen convinced the latter that the tested gear can improve fishing effort by catching fish of higher quality that would assure favourable economic returns through higher prices and less risk to the resource base. The NAFP has helped also by providing incentives to borrowers i.e. credit to purchase trammel nets, purse seines, drift nets/gill nets and long-lines for open sea fishing and thus improve efficiency of fish production.

The presence of trawlers close to the shore inevitably leads to conflicts because of the destruction of fishing gear, particularly gill nets and long lines. It also harms the substrate and fish stocks to the detriment of the sustainable use of the resource. The co-management committees are now fighting along side with the Fisheries Administration to control encroachment and enforce the 3 nautical mile trawler exclusion zone from the coast, because it gives them wider territory for fishing activities, and reduces coastal harvesting pressure. The establishment of the Artisanal Fishermen's Association of Moma and the Artisanal Fishermen's Association of Angoche has enhanced further empowerment of the fishermen and the co-management arrangement of fishing initiatives and programmes.

The Co-management Committees provide a forum where the fishermen discuss regulation issues with the fisheries institutions and the Marine Administration and reach a consensus on the measures to be taken. Subjects that are being discussed and dealt with by the marine co-management committees include: sensitisation of fishermen on protected species; regulation of the intensity of fishing activity including definition of allowable number of fishing units for migrant fishermen, length of fishing period, mesh size for fishing nets, control of exploitation based on projections of thresholds for amount of catch related to number of fishermen; prohibition of underwater spear fishing and of toxic substances and explosives to harvest fish; delineation of areas of local jurisdiction; conflict resolution between artisanal fishermen and between artisanal and semi/industrial fishermen; confiscation of prohibited fishing gear; and management of licences for fishing gear.

The project has helped the Fisheries Research Institute (IIP) to establish a successful monitoring system for the collection of data from the many artisanal fishery centres in the area. A total of 250 aquatic species have been encountered in the catches. Three studies have commenced and others will be undertaken in order to assess biological parameters of all commercial species including maturity size, reproduction periods, spawning and migratory cycles and estimate the volume of the resource. The knowledge of the characteristics of the resource is needed to guide development actions and resource management measures that would safeguard the long-term sustainability of the country fishery resources. As a result of these studies it was made possible for the Project to achieve the legal dispensation of mosquito nets and extension of the trawler exclusion zone 3 nautical miles from the coast. The establishment and successful development of the fisheries data collection system is now being replicated in other parts of the country through a programme supported by French Co-operation.

Recommendations:

 

  • The established institutional dialogue and the creation of a favourable environment for artisanal fisheries constitute a very sound activity in the process of regulation through empowerment of both the fishermen organisations and the fisheries institutions.
  • The Project continues its efforts towards local authorities to accelerate legal recognition of the co-management organisations and associations including definition of competence and relevant powers.
  • The development and establishment of a fisheries data collection system was successful and the model is now being applied in other parts of the country though a programme supported by French Co-operation. The stock assessment studies will be better served if the study area presently concentrated along the narrow northern coast of the Sofala Bank is extended further southwards to cover both Zambezia and Sofala areas of the Bank.

Artisanal fisheries project to sub-sector investment programme

Momade is from Angoche town and has a boat but his fishing gear was very old and he could neither buy a new one nor buy material to repair it. Supply in his area was non-existent and prevailing prices were very high. Even if he had the money, purchases could be made only in Nacala, some 250-km away. Through the Project, supplies of fishing gear and spare parts for boat rehabilitation are now stored in Angoche and sold at lower prices than before due to competition and lowering of taxes and tariffs. Momade received a loan through FFPI (Small Industry Development Fund) and has replaced the old gear. His fish catches increased and his income improved.

The NAFP has evolved along its life, both in terms of its component structure and the profile of activities within specific components. This process approach to planning has allowed the project to adapt in keeping with both accumulated experience and changing economic and social conditions. In terms of the general approach, the NAFP has repeatedly validated the effectiveness of the integrated cross-sectoral methodology by targeting concurrently technical, commercial, social and institutional components.

The Project directed institutional targeting towards strengthening the capacity and promotion of the formation of community-based organisations as a medium for self-mobilisation for development purposes. The Project has been instrumental for the formation of 142 community organisations (14 Resource and Co-management Committees, 2 Fishermen Associations, 122 Water Committees and 4 Micro-project Committees) with an estimated 950 members, who actively participate in project activities aiming at improving the living conditions of the communities in the project areas. The project has targeted directly the poorest in the communities through the FFPI credit scheme and the CARE/CRER (Rural Enterprise) micro credit programme by organising 131 savings and credit groups in the poorest strata including women. Experience shows that the micro-finance programme is a very appropriate way of addressing the financial needs of the poorest target group. The stamp-based scheme has been better in targeting women as well as establishing a simpler and more comprehensible system. The Project maintains regular co-ordination meetings with CRER and FFPI to further improve targeting of the poorest members of the communities.

The Project directed functional targeting towards removing single or multiple critical constraints to artisanal fisheries development namely the supply of inputs, provision of credit and the development of infrastructure. The project has targeted through formal credit small- and large-scale traders to improve marketing and the accessibility of fishing equipment and other inputs in the area. The Project has been able to access the whole target group through the Rural Infrastructure Rehabilitation component and the micro projects of the Community Development Fund. Especially, the Water Supply and Road Rehabilitation schemes have contributed significantly to raising the standard of living in the targeted communities. Road rehabilitation has also benefited many more people who live outside the project area. Developing infrastructure implies that the whole of the population in the targeted areas is benefiting from the project inputs.

The third ingredient is the primacy of market linkages between the fishermen and the private sector input distribution and marketing fish and fish products. The establishment and maintenance of a market information system to support associated project activities (especially fisheries technology and processing) has been proven to be relevant and useful. The Project has also benefited traders living outside the project area, who now use the rehabilitated roads to market their goods in the fishing communities and buy fish to sell in the interior parts of the country. Sustainable methods for information collection have still to be perfected. The Project tapped in a rather systematic way local knowledge and experience and blended with ‘modern' technical knowledge suitable to the context and environment in which the fishing communities live and operate.

Through judicious application of targeting modalities, the project has not only been able to spur the fishermen motivation to development and expand their fishing activities but also to promote an integrated, wider development within the fishery sector. The experience here illustrates that development investments would have a far more reaching effect and impact, if the strategies shift from a narrow project area focus to a wider sectoral integrated programme approach. Such a shift of the artisanal sub-sector investment programme is consistent with current concerns in IFAD with a shift in development planning towards a wider programme approach.

Recommendations:

 

  • The NAFP has repeatedly validated the effectiveness of the integrated cross-sectoral methodology by targeting concurrently technical, commercial, social and institutional components. Future development interventions should shift from a narrow project focus to a wider sectoral integrated programme approach. Individual projects would address specific objectives within the larger programme.
  • IFAD supported projects based on the general programme approach should make best use of the accumulated experience from the NAFP and include in the process stakeholder participation and empowerment.

Women's empowerment

Anchita is from Angoche town. She is rather shy, has 5 children and has always lived in poverty. She hardly made any savings in her life. Anchita told the Evaluation Mission that she joined a savings club about 18 months ago, very reluctantly in the beginning, and learned gradually how friends could get together and use savings to finance small generating activities. She borrowed from her group and started a micro-business trading small domestic items such as soap, cooking oil, matches etc. and cakes, which she prepares herself. Anchita is now in a position to send her children to school and buy books for them.

A serious attempt has been made by the Project to empower women by integration into community committees and other project activities. In each of the 122 water committees formed by the Project in the 42 communities, at least 2 members are women. In fact, in many committees more than 2 women were elected, who assume any duty including that of controller, mechanic, collector or cleaner. Similarly, women participate in the micro-project committees for schools and health posts and participate actively along with men in fulfilling the duties expected of the committees. In the past, it has been assumed that the responsibility for decision on borehole siting and management of the wells was that of adult males. However, field survey has indicated that children and women were often primarily responsible for issues to do with water in the family. This implies that it is not always precise to say that programmes have followed a participatory approach because adult males were consulted in community meetings. This meant that children and women most implicated in decisions about water have often been excluded from deliberations. The Nampula project recognised this weakness and ensured that participation involved the full range of opinions and input and represented a truly participatory approach.

Women were, also, able to join credit and savings associations and have been active particularly in savings. In fact, 75% of the membership of the 55 savings clubs is made of women. Women members of the groups were able to save and borrow in order to buy food commodities for trade within the communities. Active participation including women in these committees is a clear manifestation of a sense of ownership of the social services. The NAFP created community awareness on development prospects through women empowerment and developed skills necessary to ensure that women in fishing communities effectively participate in decision-making processes that affect their well being. In a society traditionally dominated by men where women have no voice, the participation of women in water committees together with men is considered a very important and potentially far reaching project achievement.

Recommendations:

  • To further alleviate social and economic constraints encountered by women, there is need to carry out a gender study to review current demand for services to the women in fishermen communities, assess the availability of these services from existing institutions and NGOs and develop a programme to meet local needs including initiatives in adult education and vocational training for undertaking income generating activities.
  • Strategies to accelerate women empowerment process should include building awareness of the economic and social benefits accruing from women participation in income-generating activities, including access to employment opportunities and credit facilities as well as satisfying basic needs, health, education, etc.

 


This completion point reflects an understanding among the core partners in the evaluation process of the Nampula Artisanal Fisheries Project (NAFP) to adopt and use the lessons learned and recommendations from this evaluation exercise, not only in the implementation of the NAFP, but also in designing new projects and programmes aimed towards ameliorating the overall livelihood of artisanal fisheries communities. The core partners included the Institute for the Development of Small-Scale Fisheries (IDPPE), Fisheries Research Institute (IIP), Small Industry Development Fund (FFPI), CARE and IFAD (represented by the Africa II Division and the Office of Evaluation and Studies).

Burundi Country Strategy and Programme Evaluation profile #152 – French
Niger Country Strategy and Programme Evaluation Profile issue #149 - French
Morocco Country Strategy and Programme Evaluation (Profile Issue #150-2021) – French
Uganda Country Strategy and Programme Evaluation (Profile Issue #151-2021)
Sierra Leone Country Strategy and Programme Evaluation (Profile #142-2019)
Madagascar Country Strategy and Programme Evaluation (Profile Issue #145-2020) – French
Impact evaluation of the Food Security and Development Support Project in the Maradi Region in Niger (Issue #141 - 2019) – French
Impact evaluation of the Food Security and Development Support Project in the Maradi Region in Niger (Profile issue #141 - 2019) – English
Profile: 2019 Annual Report on Results and Impact of IFAD operations
Corporate-level evaluation on IFAD’s Engagement in Pro-poor Value Chain Development (Issue #139-2019)
Mexico Country Strategy and Programme Evaluation (Profile Issue #138-2019) - Spanish
Sri Lanka Country Strategy and Programme Evaluation (Issue #137-2019)
Republic of Kenya: Country Strategy and Programme Evaluation (Issue #136-2018)
Impact Evaluation of the Smallholder Horticulture Marketing Programme in Kenya (Issue #135-2018)
Profile: Tunisia Country Strategy and Programme Evaluation (Issue #133-2018) - French
Profile: Tunisia Country Strategy and Programme Evaluation (Issue #133-2018) - English
Ecuador Country Strategy and Programme Evaluation (Issue #144-2020) - Spanish
Burkina Faso: Country Strategy and Programme Evaluation (Issue #135-2018) - French
Honduras: Betting on Rural Development (Issue #7 - 2002) - English
Panama: This land is our land (Issue #6 - 2002) - Spanish
IFAD thematic study on rural finance in China (Issue #3 - 2002)
Impact evaluation of the Jharkhand-Chhattisgarh Tribal Development Programme (Issue #106 - 2015)
Evaluation profile: Republic of Turkey Country Programme Evaluation (Issue #111 - 2016)
India - Building peace: what role for development? (Issue #9 - 2003)
Evaluating IFAD's Country Programme in Sri Lanka (Issue #5 - 2002)
Tunisia: tuning in to farmers' needs (Issue #22-2004)
Breaking New Ground: Leasehold Forestry in Nepal (Issue #18 -2004)
Agricultural innovation: defining IFAD's role (Issue #20-2004)
Benin: Staying out of poverty (Issue #23 - 2004)
Boosting food security for poor farmers (Issue #17 - 2004)
IFAD gets closer to the ground (Issue #47 - 2007)
The Gambia Country Programme Evaluation (Issue #109 - 2015)
Evaluation profile, Country Strategy and Programme Evaluation Democratic Republic of the Congo (French)
Evaluation profile, Country Strategy and Programme Evaluation Democratic Republic of the Congo - (English)
Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia Country Programme Evaluation (Issue #108 - 2015)
Evaluation synthesis on IFAD’s support for environment and natural resource management (Profile issue #117 - 2016)
Making a difference in Mali: performance and innovation (Issue #49-2008)
Community-driven development for rural poverty reduction (Issue #55 - 2008)
Ghana: Rooting for poor farmers (Issue #21 - 2004)
Striving for sustainability and equity (Issue #14 - 2004)
Ensuring Realistic Design: Learning from Experiences in Niger (Issue #48 - 2007)
Namibia: Better livelihood opportunities (issue #12 -2003)
Nicaragua Country Strategy and Programme Evaluation (Issue #123-2017) - Spanish
Ethiopia: Providing poor people living in rural areas sustainable access to financial services (Issue #75 - 2011)
Rwanda: Smallholder Cash and Export Crops Development Project (Issue #79-2011)
Interim evaluation of IFAD's Bokeo Food Security Project (Issue #4 - 2002)
Philippines Country Strategy and Programme Evaluation (Issue #120-2016)
Evaluation Profile Viet Nam Banking on the poor? (Issue #1-2002)
The right ingredients for Making Sustainable Impact (Issue #70 - 2010)
Bridging the Digital Divide (Issue #8 - 2002)
Democratic People’s Republic of Korea: Unleashing the entrepreneurial talent of rural household (Issue #61 - 2009)
Lao People's Democratic Republic Supporting community initiatives to replace shifting cultivation (Issue #78 - 2011)
Remarkable impact. Will it last? Pakistan: Dir Area Support Project (Issue #53 - 2008)
Republic of the Philippines: Indigenous Peoples' Self-determination and Drive to Succeed (Issue #50 - 2008)
Rapid Change in China’s Qinling Mountains (Issue #67 - 2010)
Philippines: Banking on Grameen. Is it Viable in the Philippines? (Issue #13-2003)
Dominican Republic: South Western Region SmallFarmers Project, Phase II (Issue # 80 - 2011)
Marenass is our project (Issue #15 - 2003)
Setting up a rural credit system in post-soviet Georgia: a rocky road to follow (Issue #45 - 2007)
Romania: Apuseni development project (Issue #58-2009)
Republic of Yemen: Raymah Area Development Project (Issue #72 - 2010)
Corporate-level evaluation on IFAD’s financial architecture (Issue #132-2018)
Evaluation profile: Cambodia Country Strategy and Programme Evaluation (Issue #128-2018)
Angola: Focus on small-scale family farming (Issue #131-2018) - Portuguese
Angola: Focus on small-scale family farming (Issue #131-2018) - English
Peru Country Strategy and Programme Evaluation (Issue #130-2018) - Spanish
Panama: This land is our land (Issue #6 - 2002) - English
Morocco: Managing the 'commons' (Issue #11 - 2003)
Jordan: Tapping finite resources (Issue #10 - 2003)
Honduras: Betting on Rural Development (Issue #7 - 2002) - Spanish
Participation: from Words to Action (Issue #16 - 2004) - French
Participation: from Words to Action (Issue #16 - 2004) - English
The Community-initiated Agriculture and Resource Management Project (Issue #52 - 2008)
Cameroon Country Strategy and Programme Evaluation (Issue #129-2018) - French
Cameroon Country Strategy and Programme Evaluation (Issue #129-2018) - English
Argentine Republic Country Programme Evaluation (Issue #73 - 2010) - Spanish
Argentine Republic Country Programme Evaluation (Issue #73 - 2010) - English
IFAD’s performance and impact in decentralizing environments: Experiences from Ethiopia, Tanzania and Uganda ( Issue #36 - 2005)
Profile: Evaluation Manual second edition
Supporting decentralized rural development (Issue #85 - 2012)
Ecuador Country Programme Evaluation (Issue #95 - 2014) - Spanish
Ecuador Country Programme Evaluation (Issue #95 - 2014) - English
Mali Country Programme Evaluation (Issue #87 - 2013) - French
Mali Country Programme Evaluation (Issue #87 - 2013) - English
Madagascar Country Programme Evaluation (Issue #90 - 2013) - French
Madagascar Country Programme Evaluation (Issue #90 - 2013) - English
Senegal Country Programme evaluation (Issue #97 - 2014)
Senegal Country Programme evaluation (Issue #97 - 2014) - French
Federative Republic of Brazil: Country Programme Evaluation - Profile (Issue #107 - 2015) - Portuguese
Federative Republic of Brazil: Country Programme Evaluation - Profile (Issue #107 - 2015) - English
Bangladesh Country Programme Evaluation (Issue #105 - 2016)
Nigeria Country Programme Evaluation (Issue #113 - 2016)
Evaluation profile (Issue #100 - 2014)
Evaluation profile: A strong partnership for rural poverty reduction (Issue #98 - 2014) - Chinese
Evaluation profile: A strong partnership for rural poverty reduction (Issue #98 - 2014) - English
Evaluation Profile: Rural poverty reduction in a middle-income country (Issue #51 - 2008)
Republic of Mozambique country strategy and programme evaluation (Issue #124 – 2017) - Portuguese
Republic of Mozambique country strategy and programme evaluation (Issue #124 – 2017) - English
Mozambique: Niassa Agricultural Development Project (Issue #46 - 2007)
Corporate-level evaluation on the IFAD Policy for Grant Financing (Issue # 99 - 2014)
Alleviating rural poverty in a fragile environment (Issue #89 - 2013)
Evaluating IFAD's Country Programme in Syria (Issue #2 - 2002)
Albania: Mountain Areas Development Programme (Issue #57 - 2008)
Ethiopia: Country Programme Evaluation (Issue #59 - 2009)
IFAD Replenishments Corporate-level evaluation (Issue #92 - 2014)
IFAD’s Support to Scaling Up of Results (Issue #125-2017)
Corporate-level evaluation on IFAD’s Decentralization Experience (issue #119 - 2016)
Enhancing partnerships in development: IFAD support to South-South cooperation (Issue #116-2016)
The Sudan: Country Programme Evaluation 2008/9 (Issue #62 - 2009)
Kingdom of Morocco: Country programme evaluation (Issue #54-2008)
Providing finance for commercial farming (Issue #94)
Impact evaluation of the Agricultural Support Project in Georgia (Issue #127 - 2017)
Tunisia: Integration Disintegrated (Issue #25 - 2004)
Argentina: Rural Development Project for the Northeastern Provinces (Issue #63 - 2009)
Going organic: an attractive alternative for small farmers? (Issue #19-2004)
Republic of Guatemala: Inducing development in a post-conflict setting (Issue #65 - 2009)
Brazil: A multi-dimensional approach to rural poverty reduction (Issue #77 - 2011)
Philippines: Helping indigenous people and the poor in upland, coastal and agrarian-reform lowland areas (Issue #65-2009)
Islamic Republic of Pakistan: Country programme evaluation (Issue #56 - 2008)
Seizing Strategic Opportunities for Rural Poverty Alleviation (Issue #91 - 2014)
India Country Programme Evaluation (#114 - 2016)
Effective Partnership between India and IFAD (Issue #68 - 2010)
Promoting commercial smallholder agriculture (issue #88 - 2013)
From reconstruction to growth in Rwanda (Issue #83 - 2012)
Tanzania's rural poor: Making it to market (Issue#81 - 2011)
Mozambique country programme evaluation: Developing capacity from scratch in rural areas (Issue #69 - 2010)
Successful integrated rural development in Madagascar (Issue #60 - 2009)
Impact Evaluation of Sofala Bank Artisanal Fisheries Project (Profile issue #122)
United Republic of Tanzania Country Programme Evaluation (Issue #103 - 2015)
Ghana Rural Enterprises Project, Phase II (Issue #82 - 2011)
Alleviating poverty through natural resources management (Issue #76 - 2011)
Ghana: Country Programme Evaluation Profile (2012)
Evaluation Profile République du Bénin Projet d'activités génératrices de revenus (PAGER)
Increased productivity of roots and tubers in Benin (Issue #71 - 2010)
Evaluation Synthesis on IFAD’s Engagement in Middle-Income Countries: Profile (Issue #96-2014)
Corporate-level evaluation on IFAD’s Performance-based Allocation System (PBAS) (issue #112 - 2016)
Profile: Corporate-level evaluation on IFAD’s engagement in fragile and conflict-affected states and situations (Issue #104-2015)
Plurinational State of Bolivia: Country Programme Evaluation (Issue #102 - 2015) - Spanish
Plurinational State of Bolivia: Country Programme Evaluation (Issue #102 - 2015) - English
Profile: Annual Report on the Results and Impact 2017
Profile: Annual Report on the Results and Impact 2016
Profile: Annual Report on the Results and Impact 2015
Profile: Annual Report on the Results and Impact 2014
Profile: Annual Report on the Results and Impact 2012
Niger Country Strategy and Programme Evaluation Insight issue #61 - French
Enseignements No 64 Burundi
De la gestion durable des ressources naturelles à l’adaptation au changement climatique au Maroc : Enseignements tirés des appuis du FIDA (Insight Issue #61) – French
Managing social and environmental challenges in value chain initiatives (Insights Issue #63)
For inclusive sustainable growth – beyond asset transfer and skills training (Insights Issue #65-2021)
Sierra Leone: Bringing financial services closer to rural populations in Sierra Leone (Insight #56-2019)
La promotion de la microentreprise rurale: quel apport du FIDA? (Insight Issue #59-2020) – French
Ecuador: Fortaleciendo las oportunidades para los productores de pequeña escala en las transformaciones rurales del país (Issue 58-2020) – Spanish
Supporting Inclusive Commercialization of Agriculture in Nepal (Insight Issue #57-2019)
Mexico Apoyo a Comunidades, Ejidos y Pequeños Productores Rurales Pobres en la Gestión de Recursos Naturales y Adaptación al Cambio Climático (Insight Issue #55-2019)
Sri Lanka Partnerships between agribusinesses and smallholder farmers (Issue #54-2019)
Kenya: IFAD ’s support to smallholder agricultural value chains in Kenya (Issue #53-2018)
Tunisia: Innovative development approaches in Tunisia for rural poverty reduction (Issue #51-2018) - French
Burkina Faso: Accès effectif et durable des petits producteurs et ruraux pauvres burkinabè aux crédits offerts par des institutions de microfinance (Issue #52-2018) - French
Beyond the framework (Issue #1 - 2003)
Tunisia: Innovative development approaches in Tunisia for rural poverty reduction (Issue #51-2018) - English
Cameroon: Behind every data point there is a human story (Issue #49-2018) - English
Evaluation insight: Republic of Turkey - Addressing challenges in inclusive and sustainable development (Issue #40 - 2016)
Microfinance in Georgia and IFAD’s role in the sector (issue #47 - 2017)
Decentralized project implementation coordinated at the central government level (Issue #16 - 2011) - Spanish
Decentralized project implementation coordinated at the central government level (Issue #16 - 2011) - English
Country context and the impact of IFAD-funded activities (Insight - Issue #8)
Nigeria Country Programme Evaluation insight - Issue #42, 2016
Cambodia - Evaluation insight: Considerations when targeting the rural poor and using a group-based approach (Issue #48-2018)
Angola: A partnership for Farmer Field Schools in Angola (Issue #50-2018) - English
Angola: A partnership for Farmer Field Schools in Angola (Issue #50-2018) - Portuguese
Corporate-level Evaluation on IFAD Replenishments (Issue #28 - 2014) - English
Corporate-level evaluation on IFAD’s engagement in fragile and conflict-affected states and situations (issue #36 - 2015) - English
Grants in other international financial institutions: lessons for IFAD (Issue #32 - 2014 ) - English
Communautés pastorales de la région de Matam (#30 - 2014)
Cameroon: Behind every data point there is a human story (Issue #49-2018) - French
IFAD support for the development of rural enterprises in Viet Nam - work in progress (Issue #20 - 2012)
Ecuador: Challenges and opportunities in an evolving country context (Issue #27 - 2014) - English
Ecuador: Challenges and opportunities in an evolving country context (Issue #27 - 2014) - Spanish
Federative Republic of Brazil Country Programme Evaluation: Insight (Issue #37 - 2015) - Portuguese
Federative Republic of Brazil Country Programme Evaluation: Insight (Issue #37 - 2015) - English
The Philippines Country Strategy and Programme Evaluation - Knowledge management stimulates innovation and bridges the gap between grants and loan projects (Issue #45-2016)
Evaluation insights: Promoting private-sector partnerships in Zambia (Issue #33 - 2014)
Enseignements: Crises, conflits et développement rural dans le Nord du Mali (Numéro 22, mai 2013)
Evaluation insight: Crises, conflicts and rural development in the north of Mali (Issue #22 - 2013)
Evaluation insight: Support to the monitoring and strategic management of the programme and non-lending activities: lessons from the IFAD country programme in Madagascar (Number 25, October 2013)
Enseignements: Appui au suivi et à la gestion stratégique du programme et aux activités hors prêt: leçons du programme de pays du FIDA à Madagascar (Numéro 25, octobre 2013)
Evaluation insight: Better targetting of vulnerable populations (Issue #44 - 2016)
Enseignements: Pour un meilleur ciblage des populations vulnérables (Numéro 44, Octobre 2016)
Evaluation insight: Promoting innovations and scaling up impact (Issue #31 - 2014) - Chinese
Evaluation insight: Promoting innovations and scaling up impact (Issue #31 - 2014) - English
Evaluation insight: The role of IFAD in a middle-income country such as Brazil (Issue #5 - 2008)
Pastoral communities in Matam region (Issue #30 2014)
Mozambique: Rome-based agencies collaborating to improve nutrition in Mozambique (Issue #46 - 2017) - Portuguese
Mozambique: Rome-based agencies collaborating to improve nutrition in Mozambique (Issue #46 - 2017) - English
Agricultural commercialization in Nepal’s hills and mountains (Issue #24 - 2013)
Ethiopia Country programme evaluation: Using a programmatic approach to lending (Issue #38 - 2015)
The Gambia country programme evaluation IFAD’s targeting strategies in The Gambia (Issue #39 - 2015)
Delegation of authority is essential to a successful country presence (Issue #3)
Enhancing sustainability of development benefits in Sudan (Issue #11 - 2009)
Targeting and community development approaches: IFAD’s experience in Morocco (Issue #6 - 2008)
The potential of conservation farming for adaptation to climate change (Issue #28 - 2014)
Plurinational State of Bolivia - Country Programme Evaluation (Issue #34 - 2014) - Spanish
Plurinational State of Bolivia - Country Programme Evaluation (Issue #34 - 2014) - English
Brazil: System-building and leveraging state policies for the development of family agriculture (Issue #17 - 2011)
A Winning Development Strategy? (Issue #2 - 2003)
Operating in remote disadvantaged and conflict-affected areas of Pakistan (Issue #9 - 2008)
Small farmer poverty amidst Indonesia’s rising prosperity (Issue #26 - 2014)
Republic of India Country Programme Evaluation Innovative solutions to improve productivity of rainfed (Issue #43 – 2016)
Empowering women through self-help groups (Issue #13 - 2010)
What might agricultural interventions bring to tribal people? (Issue #12 - 2010)
Rural cooperatives substantially increase their outreach to the poorest rural people in partnership with IFAD (Issue #15 - 2011)
People’s Republic of Bangladesh Country Programme Evaluation: Policy engagement and strategic partnership for greater impact (Issue #41 - 2016)
Value chain development through public-private partnerships: opportunities and challenges for small farmers (Issue #23 - 2013)
Farm intensification, crop diversification and non- farming jobs in Rwanda (Issue #18 - 2012)
Working through an agricultural sector-wide approach and a project-modality - IFAD’s experience in Tanzania (Issue #35 - 2015)
Mozambique country programme evaluation: Improving the market participation of smallholders and artisanal fishers (Issue #14 - 2010)
Matching grants: a smarter way to subsidize rural finance? (Issue #19 - 2012)
Key elements for supporting the renewed focus on agricultural productivity and small-scale agricultural development in Nigeria (Issue #10 - 2009)
The demand-driven approach: advantages and risks (Issue #4 - 2008)
Malawi CSPE - infographic
Infographic (March 2019) - Spanish
Infographic: Tunisia country strategy and programme evaluation
Infographic: Evaluation on IFAD’s Engagement in Pro-poor Value Chain Development - Corporate-level evaluation
Infographic: CLE on IFAD's Performance-based Allocation System (2005-2015)
Infographic: CLE IFAD's decentralization experience
Infographic: Kenya - Country Strategy and Programme Evaluation
Infographic: Kenya Impact Evaluation of the smallholder horticulture marketing programme
Infographic: Sri Lanka - Country Strategy and Programme Evaluation
Infographic: Burkina Faso country strategy and programme evaluation - French
Infographic: Turkey Country programme evaluation
Infographic : Impact Evaluation of Sofala Bank Artisanal Fisheries Project
Infographic: Georgia Country Strategy and Programme Evaluation
Infographic: IFAD’s financial architecture - Corporate-level evaluation
Infographic Angola country strategy and programme evaluation – English
Infographic Angola country strategy and programme evaluation – Portuguese
Infographic: Cambodia Country Strategy and Programme Evaluation infographic
Infographic
Infographic: Bangladesh Country Programme Evaluation
Infographic: Peru Country Strategy and Programme Evaluation - Spanish
Infographic: The Philippines Country Strategy and Programme Evaluation
Arab Republic of Egypt Country Strategy and Programme Evaluation - Infographic
Infographic: United Republic of Tanzania Country programme evaluation
Infographic: Nigeria Country programme evaluation
Infographic: Mozambique country strategy and programme evaluation - Portuguese
Infographic: Mozambique country strategy and programme evaluation - English
Infographic: Evaluaciòn de la Estrategia y el Programa en el País - Repùblica de Nicaragua (1999-2016)
Infographic: Ethiopia Country Programme Evaluation
Infographic: Impact evaluation of the Agricultural Support Project in Georgia
Infographic: IFAD’s Approach to Evaluation Capacity Development
Infographic: Democratic Republic of Congo Country Strategy and Programme Evaluation
Infographic: India Country Programme Evaluation
Infographic: IFAD’s Engagement in Fragile and Conflict-affected States and Situations - Corporate-level evaluation
Infographic: 2017 Annual Report on Results and Impact of IFAD operations
Approach paper: Georgia Country strategy and programme evaluation
Approach paper: Republic of Mozambique - Sofala Bank Artisanal Fisheries Project
Approach paper: Georgia - Agricultural Support Project
Approach paper: FAO's and IFAD's Engagement in Pastoral Development
Approach paper: Non-lending Activities in the Context of South-South Cooperation - Evaluation Synthesis
Approach paper: Smallholder Access to Markets: Evaluation Synthesis
Approach paper: IFAD’s Support to Scaling Up of Results
Approach paper: IFAD’s Country-level Policy Dialogue
Approach paper: Building partnerships for enhanced development effectiveness – a review of country-level experiences and results
Approach paper - IFAD’s support to livelihoods involving aquatic resources from small-scale fisheries, small-scale aquaculture and coastal zones
Approach paper – IFAD’s Engagement in Fragile and Conflict-affected States and Situations
Morocco: Rural development project in the eastern middle atlas mountains (French version)
Corporate-level evaluation of IFAD's performance-based allocation system Draft approach paper
Georgia: Rural Development Programme for Mountainous and Highland Areas
The Philippines: Rural Microenterprise Promotion Programme (RuMEPP)
Republic of Zambia
United Republic of Tanzania
République du Sénégal - french version
Nigeria
Republic of Moldova
Republic of Indonesia
The Gambia
People's Republic of China
Plurinational State of Bolivia
Republic of India Country Programme Evaluation
Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia
Approach Paper The Republic of Turkey Country Programme Evaluation
The People’s Republic of Bangladesh
Draft approach paper on the corporate-level evaluation on efficiency
IFAD Policy for Grant Financing Corporate-level evaluation Approach paper
Corporate-level evaluation on IFAD’s replenishments:
IFAD Policy on Supervision and Implementation Support Corporate-level Evaluation Approach Paper
The Philippines
Kingdom of Cambodia
brazil_cpe.pdf
Viet Nam: Pro-poor Partnerships for Agroforestry Development Project
Palestinian Authority Natural Resources Management Programme
Sri Lanka: Post -Tsunami Coastal Rehabilitation and Resource Management Programme
Republica de Perú: Fortalecimiento de mercados, diversificación de los ingresos y mejoramiento de las condiciones de vida en la Sierra Sur Evaluación de los Resultados de Proyecto
Nicaragua: National Agricultural Technology and Training Programme - Technical Assistance Fund
Nicaragua
Maldives: Post-Tsunami Agriculture and Fisheries Rehabilitation Programme
Malawi: Rural Livelihoods Support Programme
Lesotho: Rural Financial Intermediation Programme
Republic of Ghana: Root and Tuber Improvement and Marketing Programme (RTIMP)
Approach paper: Democratic Republic of Congo Country Strategy and Programme Evaluation
Cameroon
Cambodia: Rural Livelihoods Improvement Project in Kratie, Preah Vihear and Ratanakiri
Republic of Mozambique
Laos: Northern Region Sustainable Livelihoods Through Livestock Development Project
Guyana: Rural enterprise and agricultural development project
ESN Targeting in IFAD-supported projects
ESN Targeting - Report
Approach paper: Smallholder Access to Markets: Evaluation Synthesis
Approach paper: IFAD’s Support to Scaling Up of Results
Approach paper: IFAD’s Country-level Policy Dialogue
Approach paper: Building partnerships for enhanced development effectiveness – a review of country-level experiences and results
Approach paper - IFAD’s support to livelihoods involving aquatic resources from small-scale fisheries, small-scale aquaculture and coastal zones
Infographic: Evaluation synthesis report on IFAD's support to fisheries
Infographic: IFAD's Engagement with Indigenous Peoples - Evaluation Synthesis
ECG paper on Gender equality and development evaluation units
Evaluation synthesis brief
Concept note
What Works for Gender Equality and Women’s Empowerment: A review of practices and results in IFAD
ESRs at a glance - French
Full report
Executive summary
Executive summary
Full document
Full document
Executive summary
Full document
Executive summary
Executive summary
Executive summary
Overview and FAO and IFAD Management's responses - Spanish
Overview and FAO and IFAD Management's responses - French
Overview and FAO and IFAD Management's responses - English
Full document
Full document
Executive summary
Executive summary
Full document
Executive summary
Full document
Executive summary
Full document
Full document
Full document
IFAD’s Support to Scaling Up of Results (Issue #125-2017)
Extract from the Agreement at Completion Point
Agreement at Completion Point
Portoguese version
Community Organizations and Empowerment
The Adoption of Organic Agriculture Among Small Farmers in Latin America and the Caribbean - Spanish
Full document
Full document
Full document
Uganda Country Programme Evaluation - Agreement at completion point
Ethiopia Country Porgramme Evaluation - Agreement at Completion Point
Nigeria Country Programme Evaluation - Agreement at Completion Point
Agreement at Completion Point: Islamic Republic of The Gambia Country Programme Evaluation
Network of IFAD-supported projects in Latin America and the Caribbean (FIDAMERICA) - Phase II - spanish
Extract of Agreement at Completion Point: India Country Programme Evaluation
Republic of Chad - Ouadis of Kanem agricultural development project - interim evaluation- Full document (french)
République du Sénégal: Projet de développement agricole dans le département de Matam (PRODAM) - Rapport d’évaluation intermédiaire
West Noubaria Rural Development Project Agreement at Completion Point
Full document
Rural Livelihoods Support Programme Agreement at Completion Point
Agreement at completion point

Related Publications

Related Assets

Related news

Related Assets

Related Events

Related Assets